(no subject)
Dec. 28th, 2009 11:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
silentwatersfemale ejaculation: strange, strange, strange.
I guess, because I've had lots of orgasms in my life, and I have experienced the extremely wet, dripping, happy pussy many times- but never, never have I experienced anything I'd say was in the realm of "ejaculation" (like in the sense of projectile body fluid), I find the whole concept of female ejaculation strange and uncommon. Yet, to browse through online sex advice forums, you find multiple threads of girls saying it can and does happen to them, and it is like- not something that comes out of the pussy, but out of the urethra, like urine would, but it is not urine.
This led me on a confused search- I confess, as much learning as I've done about the human body, the intricacy of all the mechanical parts "down there"- I don't know everything, and maybe there's something I've missed- in my mind, it's like, okay, bladder exists somewhere above the vulva, and contains waste liquid, which is relieved by peeing through the urethra, and ... end of story. If female ejaculation is true, and there's something that comes out that hole, but it's not pee, where are the other parts? where is the other fluid generated, how does it keep from mixing with pee, and what other tubes exist to get it out the hole (without allowing pee to escape on it's way out the body from the bladder)?
I checked out wikipedia, and the tone of the whole article is... as confused as I am. And I tried to get to the bottom of it by reading some medical white papers used as sources in some articles quoted online, but they often conflict with each other in their content and interpretation-- Even more confusing is all this socio-political-feminist bullshit. I'm sorry, but I'm just after the facts, ma'am.
Is it, or is it not, medically possible, for a woman to:
A) generate fluid somewhere inside the body when sexually excited that is NOT pussy lubricant and NOT urine (we are probably talking about generating it from some third organ or gland down in the pelvis?)
B) excrete this fluid in a projectile manner from the urethra under certain sexually stimulated conditions?
C) how the FUCK do we NOT KNOW, in the year 2009? How the FUCK is this even still a question on the biological test? How is it a mystery? Why are educated people giving conflicting answers? It's okay if science said, "yes, we know this is medically possible, but just not present in all females- it's just a genetic trait like blue eyes or being able to roll your tongue into a taco shape." I'd be cool with that. But that's not what science is saying. Science is like, "we think we might know but we're not sure because we're not sure what female orgasm even IS and we don't want to step on any feminist toes and/or project inappropriate "maleness" on the description of what may or may not be happening."
WTF?
And of course, the fact that it's never happened to me, I never expect it to happen to me, and I would be totally wierded out if it DID happen to me, along with the fact that I don't know of any isolated gland in the female endocrine system that would produce "cum" like testes do for sperm-carrying ejaculate in the male, means that I have a tendency to believe it's relative urban legend and in fact, what women are experiencing as "female ejaculation" is partly or all urine, caused by loss of bladder control due to sexual stimulation, or maybe it's like tears- you know how researchers have found people's tears of pain have a different chemical makeup than tears of sadness and tears of joy- even though they all come out of the same tear ducts.
Maybe the bladder is just not as thoroughly understood as we think it is- but again, the field of urology has been around a long time, and it's 2009-- HOW DO WE NOT KNOW?!
This confounds me to no end.
I guess, because I've had lots of orgasms in my life, and I have experienced the extremely wet, dripping, happy pussy many times- but never, never have I experienced anything I'd say was in the realm of "ejaculation" (like in the sense of projectile body fluid), I find the whole concept of female ejaculation strange and uncommon. Yet, to browse through online sex advice forums, you find multiple threads of girls saying it can and does happen to them, and it is like- not something that comes out of the pussy, but out of the urethra, like urine would, but it is not urine.
This led me on a confused search- I confess, as much learning as I've done about the human body, the intricacy of all the mechanical parts "down there"- I don't know everything, and maybe there's something I've missed- in my mind, it's like, okay, bladder exists somewhere above the vulva, and contains waste liquid, which is relieved by peeing through the urethra, and ... end of story. If female ejaculation is true, and there's something that comes out that hole, but it's not pee, where are the other parts? where is the other fluid generated, how does it keep from mixing with pee, and what other tubes exist to get it out the hole (without allowing pee to escape on it's way out the body from the bladder)?
I checked out wikipedia, and the tone of the whole article is... as confused as I am. And I tried to get to the bottom of it by reading some medical white papers used as sources in some articles quoted online, but they often conflict with each other in their content and interpretation-- Even more confusing is all this socio-political-feminist bullshit. I'm sorry, but I'm just after the facts, ma'am.
Is it, or is it not, medically possible, for a woman to:
A) generate fluid somewhere inside the body when sexually excited that is NOT pussy lubricant and NOT urine (we are probably talking about generating it from some third organ or gland down in the pelvis?)
B) excrete this fluid in a projectile manner from the urethra under certain sexually stimulated conditions?
C) how the FUCK do we NOT KNOW, in the year 2009? How the FUCK is this even still a question on the biological test? How is it a mystery? Why are educated people giving conflicting answers? It's okay if science said, "yes, we know this is medically possible, but just not present in all females- it's just a genetic trait like blue eyes or being able to roll your tongue into a taco shape." I'd be cool with that. But that's not what science is saying. Science is like, "we think we might know but we're not sure because we're not sure what female orgasm even IS and we don't want to step on any feminist toes and/or project inappropriate "maleness" on the description of what may or may not be happening."
WTF?
And of course, the fact that it's never happened to me, I never expect it to happen to me, and I would be totally wierded out if it DID happen to me, along with the fact that I don't know of any isolated gland in the female endocrine system that would produce "cum" like testes do for sperm-carrying ejaculate in the male, means that I have a tendency to believe it's relative urban legend and in fact, what women are experiencing as "female ejaculation" is partly or all urine, caused by loss of bladder control due to sexual stimulation, or maybe it's like tears- you know how researchers have found people's tears of pain have a different chemical makeup than tears of sadness and tears of joy- even though they all come out of the same tear ducts.
Maybe the bladder is just not as thoroughly understood as we think it is- but again, the field of urology has been around a long time, and it's 2009-- HOW DO WE NOT KNOW?!
This confounds me to no end.
